Blog Post Constittioal Order

Analytical Paper Constitutional Order

Within the national growth of the U.S. there is a pressing issue to the people's welfare. In the history of political exploration to relativism and positivism philosophies and norms the nation's discourse in the modern-day fabric of politics to welfare is questioned in constitutional odder, quasi-law and the legal nature of the administrative law (Frohnen, B. P. & Carey, G. W., 2016; Higgs, R., 2012). Whittington, K. E. (2017) states “In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, states‐ men recognized that political representation in a republic could reflect three distinct things: property, people, and political communities.” The architecture of Article I embodies and rec‐ onciles all three forms of representation” (p. 575).

If the process of the three forms challenges power, rights, and authority amongst the people (Strang, L. J., 2019) does this order have any precedence to the intentional need? The words and language in the constitution’s preamble; liberty, justice, and happiness read as being obtainable to all American people. What happens when this is found to be untrue (Hamburger, P.,2014)?

When the welfare, of the American people is at stake by no fault of their own, the fear of freedom, provisions and ability to support and provide for the people is of concern at the domestic and global injunctions (Chatterjee, U., Shaw, R., Sivaramakrishnan, L., Mukherjee, J., & Ghosh, R., 2024; Peppercorn, I. G., & Taffin, C., 2013. The respect of the nation and its integrity is questioned as a global leader and at face value the general welfare solution to housing, poverty and homelessness relates in many cases to third-world country degradation. (SURVEY FINDS LACK OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING THE LEADING CAUSE OF HOMELESSNESS IN THE UNITED STATES. (2005).

The question to be answered asks what impact does open constitutional order and public policy language have on the nation's domestic public policy on economic housing and shelters? This issue is not a new one, and the numbers across the nation are a constant service need rather than sporadic service measure towards stable responsible effort.

In this paper the term shelter is interchangeable with the word and language associated with homeless policy and laws. Definitions for homelessness, shelters are seen as a federal measurable resource by the United Staes Department of the Housing and Urban Development. This is a question I feel is not the norm in public policy and it is not a national concern. The problem is a non-governmental business, not a local state entity agenda and is predicated on a Presidential administrative platform. Thus, public policy for economic housing and shelter system is overly broad as it pertains to housing. There is a cohesive ideology and belief within the nation on what would cause a need to utilize social welfare like the shelter system.

However, this is not a social welfare policy paper nor a criminogenic issue paper. It is a predicator of shelter system policy as it relates to housing regulation and application. Addressing the nation's problem, the paper hopes to identify the norm principal order in the open construct. Because this is not a new issue and has failed in many events on actions to be heard directly within the governance. The paper will attempt to explain the order of domestic public policy practice in economic housing, and the shelter system.

Consequently, any attempt at this analytical discussion will be limited to existing scholarly work. The research question is a concerning issue in and amongst the three government branches. And it has been for the past 70 years. In the extensive measures of platforms, issues such as public law; regulations at the state level, and legal issues to homeless (human) rights, will not be discussed. but suggest a need for ongoing research and discussion to improve the shelter systems public policy to positive outcomes to economics and housing (see appendixes A and B).

First the Christian scholarly on the quality of the life while living in the uncertainty. It will then talk about the original intent to the Constitution and public welfare, specifically the preamble and article I and IV of the Constitution regarding constitutional order, domestic public policy, economics and public warfare. Next it will identify the legal precedence through past administrative programs on housing and the shelter system. Then correlate economics and housing loopholes in the shelter policy. In conclusion the paper will tell how this contributes to new scholarly knowledge to improve the national shelter system.

Christian Scholar

As a Christian scholar, my research question is to advance the causes of liberty and human flourishing. It is my position that the U.S. government was founded by men of the cloth. Men who believed in the pure nature of a good man and that with this nature all people are created equal and should be treated as well. Christ as set for us a walk of freedom and the liberation. The true fight of the justice and democracy leaving the new world a light that can only be gotten through the natural God in all man's creation. The natural man must adhere to this walk as a duty and obedience to the future walk in creation. Set in the first laws to life's morality and rule to obligation the Christian Walk seeks the early resting place to that the heavenly can become. A peaceful place of being, a spiritual place of knowing and having.

There are many mansions in heaven, but the orders to man or so that there are many shelters on earth as well. Dwelling places for the mass and for the household. But we as a people must understand that the day of old yet for guidance and the instruction must seek to build in the modern day. Therefore, where Christ as followed so should we.

It is for this reason my research is to provide the level of understanding that will press upon the heart and mind of man to see the need in suppling a quality of life that will grant freedom and justice. The fight for liberty was won, won on with greater knowledge and grace so that the lives of many today and tomorrow will be fulfilled in maturational harmony and peace. The wisdom and knowledge of governance is granted to those who seek the work and this ability be given for the purpose. That is to responsibly “except” anything else a quality of life for “all” men. It is my belief that society has developed a norm, a norm formed from new procedures in governance and law. Quasi Law or the sub constitution, the fourth branch of government and interpretation that guides the original intent of the preamble to the constitution of all men and the equality. Otherwise, the world would not see so many people living in poverty and on the streets.

Original Intent Constitutional Order and Public Welfare

To turn over or around the biblical and the historical intent of any governance one must accept its purpose. in doing so pledge to be a light in practice and process. The original intent of the constitutional order and public welfare are unconscionable in some public goods. The constitution gives agency that is unconfinable of positive action to civil choice.

“It would be the repository of national powers, and the channel of popular energy... Finding a place for Congress within the constitutional order meant appreciating both those virtues and those vices, and finding ways to help realize and take advantage of the benefits that a legislature can bring and of finding ways to curtail the damage that it might do.” (Whittington, K. E., 2017, p. 574).

Servant leader choice and agency are compatible and reliant on governance. I argue it is the responsibility of man's achievement in society measurable upon his success. By virtue, in representation, accountability, deliberation, and transparency of an economy and ability to meet the needs of society independently. This paper argues the current public policy for economic housing stability and the programs for the shelter system are not conscionable and set in the imbalance of constitutional order, quasi law, and progressive norms. All that places domestic housing and shelter system policy at the whim of a left and right blank policy solution. Working policy models, designs, and programs, are left to operate and function in this sub system of housing called shelters where there is no social responsibility in constitutional order.

It is for this reason that shelters domestic, and global can be identified as economic dynamicysism and eco's of financial shocks to program resources (Kiesler, C. A. 1991). It has become impossible to forecast a positive measure in the system unless aligned with an additional subculture like homelessness indicators and variables such as: early head start, foster care, and means tested benefits. These social orders go against the constitutional order of governance for the sake of political actions. With this stressed representation of society, it brings on bias and inequality of a people. This goes against the fabric of the constitutional order. In many instances, circumstances prohibit the ability to exercise rights in a democratic society.

Whittington further states “The financial health of the republic stood on much broader foundations. The people are the source of financial support for the government.” (p. 576) The economic housing and shelter system forecast cannot impel the quality of life. They would be destitute due to tax burden economics v. independent responsibility. If there is a separation of the social status deemed for shelter living, it is a non-constructional order of governance. (Department of Health and Human Services 2024); (United Staes Department of Urban Development 2024). An economic housing and shelter system is applied where the people have the application of the will. Where this right vested to the people of the nation continues in discourse to the extent the nation understands the original intent of the delima to the nation's supreme law and its making. (Clifford, S., & Piston, S., 2017) The original intent of the constitutional order was to secure a new way. The new construct pressed into modern society must become from a stable and reliable construct inclusive to the rights in a democratic republic. narrow in scope and language that can be understood (Gangi, W., 1998) The preamble of the constitution tells us this. Also, the amendments to the constitution in Articles IV with the change of the language from “excepted” to “all.”

Economic Housing and the Shelter System

The economic housing and shelter systemic public policies are too broad and the language is not conducive to the practice for democracy and its republic. This causes policy indecision and failed action in passing an inclusive law. (Whittington, K., 2021) In this section I hope to explain that the issue does not reach a measurable outcome of forecasting policy. (Chatterjee, U., Shaw, R., Sivaramakrishnan, L., Mukherjee, J., & Ghosh, R. (2024) the policy slack in constructional order and quasi-law makes for both stochastic and static dynamical prolonged outcomes. Historically this fits the whole picture for public policy welfare and Presidential orders and regulations. (Higgs, R., 2012; Kiesler, C. A.,1991)

In fact, Under President Roosevelt housing regulation for the nation via a presidential order during the New Deal the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) Power Works program Housing Authority set new precedence to housing for the nation. This prevented prolonged economic housing disaster. Roosevelt's era woke up the constitutional order of intellectual normalcy to policy solutions. The shelter system in and of its purpose, is an emergency solution to a temporary problem. But the emergency identified during the political economy of Roosevelts New Deal in scope and language does not provide economic housing resources.

So, use the shelter system with the thought that I can get help from this system. You would be mistaken and would fall into greater hardship. some areas of concern with this are open-ended language to the constitutional order. The proper utility and deliverable for the people in this subculture of society to engage and act in a democratic lifestyle does not exist. The shelter system does not function and operate under any form of governance and jurisprudence to the land. It functions and operates out of a quasi and constitutional order. Since the amendment to the Constitution; Article IV; there has not been one law signed at the federal level or the state level to address the shortcomings of economics and housing in relation to shelter (see appendix section (B) Current Congressional Bill and Laws).

However, there is public policy in administrative law that prohibits the denial of housing by the housing policy and regulations passed by the supreme court. Yet, the need to provide inclusive diverse rules and application, as well as protocol and process has become a daunting issue to the country. Because current court rulings do not explain nor interpret constitutional order or quasi-law (Williams, N. A., 2021) implementation of inclusive total community connection programs aligned with the nation’s agenda.

I will explain what I mean. In public policy there are three things that must happen. The first is there must be a streamline of economics for the greater society. Second, there must be a discipline of knowledge. Third there must be a between state management collaboratives. With these policy measures in place, the goal is to apply operational and functional measures to the local and state levels. The housing and shelter system domestic public policy is limited and centers on regulations across states addressing facility management; 45 CFR Subtitle B - Subtitle B—Regulations Relating to Public Welfare.

Governance as a collective does not work for the purpose of the responsibility of a person or the social contract via the shelter system. And jurisprudence does not speak yet in the collective harm of persons faces while in the shelter system. Finally, congress does not pass laws om need base, such as shelter housing. And has in many cases doubled any piece of legislation to many of the social nuances such as poverty, family issues, welfare, and the penal system as it pertains to economics housing and the shelter system.

But this is a great problem. “Joseph Schumpeter, one of the most celebrated social scientists of the twentieth century...The March into socialism.” Foreswearing any presence of absolute knowledge of the future. The political economy would be lodged into a “halfway house” short of full-fledged socialism” (Higgs, R., 2012, p. 219). It is important here to identify what there are loopholes in the shelter system under administrative law.

Economics and housing loopholes in the shelter policy

Citizens expect local elected and appointed officials to make, implement, and evaluate public policy. In recent years, citizens' efforts to increase the economics of society have grown from the result of two national's economic hiccups' recession and the COVID-19's. The impact on life. circumstances shifted in many people's lives. Any levies that would support these shocks became and, in many states, unresponsive to the greater need of the people. Especially those whose lives depend on the service means tested benefits and government assistance.

Therefore, these two-no fault social nuances impact on the shelter system has become a place of refuge for many people, some domestic and some foreign. There are systemic resources to programs and development. And then there is the responsibility of the person and their personal economic ability (Ocejo, R. E. ,2013). The agency of governance and jurisprudence must expound upon and be settled with the understanding that the rights of the people must be contextual first. And that any other explanation for the law of the land must come from the powers of that position.

The loopholes rest in the process of governance and jurisprudence because of lack of democracy in the construct of the un-written constitution and the open nature to language. the economic housing to shelter problem lack polity to law. And the only answer to engaging destitute people is to chattel them in public facilities. Governance rights of the people are agencies where models state governance is not able to implement a working plan that will give individuals the rights to life, liberty, and freedom.

In other words, destitute, indigent, and socially marred persons who lack the ability through no fault of their own independently seek an absolute plan that would afford them economic housing in a system implemented due to emergency because of a domestic or global unrest on the nation. No democracy. The existing constitutional order has become subject to social disorder and unrest (Renan, D., 2020). For instance, the limited state collaboratives in means tested benefits research. Research shows that that foci's the function of the economies and fails to push any agenda other than a social welfare one. Research that does not impute an independence for social reduction to shelters as an unstable resource yet is used as reliable means to state economic streams.

Equally important is the knowledge needed for the purpose of a democratic society. If this knowledge is not a shared venue, then the ability to support the service means will be missed. And economic society is not a socialist one. What is known in the shelter system as a collective measure, it provides emergency services. However, it fails to meet the standards of the Supreme Court of the 1930’s as a housing emergency. Remember the language in this policy issue is homelessness and the shelter system. as a welfare economic democracy and not a social welfare problem.

When looking at it from an extended or correlated public policy. This would be policy for tax breaks (employment, development, and state balance). The limitations or red tape that must be addressed often are undone agreements and noise research. Left with no governance, a person's ability to independent economic factors is unreachable. Unless done so with extra strain and duress. This is because the systemic operation of facilities does not allow for an independent focus. But a collective nature of the service-to-service bases. In this case the system itself becomes handicap or disabling. Exiting the shelter system via an economic housing plan from a service provider hinged upon their relationship with the housing authority (Teasdale, S., 2012; Yaroni, A., 2011).

Conclusion

The Supreme law of the land rests in the constitution. In this the people trust the leadership to do as a democracy would. Ensure that their rights as a nation are being upheld with the greatest efforts. However, when the democracy itself is of question and the only understanding is to place it in the lens outside of the public good, especially when there is no alternative, presents an unstable unity.

It is the agency and the collective order of society to work for the greater good. Public agencies should agree to work with servant agencies because it is the way of democracy. However, when this democracy is challenged as an agency, it brings about a discourse that may not always fit soundly into the existing fabric. in this case the paper discussed the shelter system. Then we find that there is the construct of newnewnses that does not always allow for an inclusive outlook and the collective means.

I am speaking about how the constitutional order to economic housing and the shelter system works to develop an independent response to a responsible society. The New Deal program was to be that solution during which the nation felt that “Unemployment is the greatest economic problem that government controls and fiscal policies can and should be used to redistribute income... that the constitution places no limits on federal regulatory powers” p. (193). But we have yet to see an inclusive national turn from active shelter services to economic housing impact.

Currently scholarly works do not address this problem through the economic housing and shelter system and homelessness. The ideology of the language being interchange to an economic standard as not become a part of the un-written constitution nor the process for governance and jurisprudence. The contribution to future research is a limited explanation to the problems and issues found in the red tape of complete system with no solution to improving the national shelter system policy (Smith, C., 2022). The recommendation for a more In depth study should be conducted.

Appendix A

Global search | LII | Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu)

Shelter and housing standards. LII Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR) Title 24—Housing and Urban Development Subtitle B—Regulations Relating to Housing and Urban Development.

CHAPTER V—OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

SUBCHAPTER C—COMMUNITY FACILITIES

PART 576—EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANTS PROGRAM

Subpart E—Program Requirements

§ 576.403 Shelter and housing standards.

WaterSense products and appliances. (2) Access. The shelter must be accessible in accordance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794) and implementing regulations at 24

Amdt5.9.5 Early Jurisprudence on Regulatory Takings

Fifth Amendment:

24 CFR § 576.403 - Shelter and housing standards

12 CFR § 220.124 - Installment sale of tax-shelter programs as “arranging” for credit.

ArtI.S8.C18.7.3 Congress's Investigation and Oversight Powers (1787–1864)

ArtIII.S3.C1.4 Aid and Comfort to the Enemy as Treason

Article III, Section 3, Clause 1:

ArtIV.S3.C2.1 Property Clause Generally

Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2:

ArtIV.S3.C2.1 Property Clause Generally

Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2:

45 CFR Subtitle B - Subtitle B—Regulations Relating to Public Welfare

Appendix B

Congress.Gov https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1319

Current Congressional Bills

Became Law

H.R.1319 - American Rescue Plan Act of 2021117th Congress (2021-2022)

Democracy

S.2971 - Unhoused VOTE Act118th Congress (2023-2024)

H.R.5294 - Unhoused Voter Opportunity Through Elections Act118th Congress (2023-2024)

Bill for Private enterprise

H.R.4305 - Shelter Act118th Congress (2023-2024)

State Regulatory Amendments

SCHOOLS NOT SHELTERS ACT; Congressional Record Vol. 169, No. 123

(House - July 18, 2023)

Hide Over

Resources

Chatterjee, U., Shaw, R., Sivaramakrishnan, L., Mukherjee, J., & Ghosh, R. (2024). Homelessness to Hope: Research, Policy and Global Perspectives. (1st ed.). Elsevier.

Clifford, S., & Piston, S. (2017). Explaining Public Support for Counterproductive Homelessness Policy: The Role of Disgust. Political Behavior, 39(2), 503-525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9366-4

Frohnen, B. P. & Carey, G. W. (2016). Constitutional Morality and the Rise of Quasi-Law. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 9780674088870.

Gangi, W. (1998). From Parchment to Power: How James Madison Used the Bill of Rights to Save the Constitution. Perspectives on Political Science, 27(2), 104. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/liberty.edu?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/parchment-power-how-james-madison-used-bill/docview/194693456/se-2

Glassmana, M., Karnob, D., Erdema, G. (2010) The problems and barriers of RHYA as social policy. Children and youth services review., 2010, Vol.32(6), p.798-806

Available Online DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.01.017

Hamburger, P. (2014). Is administrative law unlawful? The University of Chicago Press

Higgs, R. (2012). Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government. Independent Institute. ISBN: 9781598131116.

Kiesler, C. A. (1991). Homelessness and public policy priorities. American Psychologist., 46(11), 1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.11.1245

Ocejo, R. E. (2013). Ethnography and the city : readings on doing urban fieldwork. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203723807

Peppercorn, I. G., & Taffin, C. (2013). Rental housing: lessons from international experience and policies for emerging markets. The World Bank.

Reppond, H.A. and Bullock, H.E. (2018), Framing Homeless Policy: Reducing Cash Aid as a Compassionate Solution. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 18: 284-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12156

Renan, D. (2020). “Institutional Settlement” in a Provisional Constitutional Order. California Law Review., 108(6). https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38804XK6V

Smith, C. (2022). Homelessness and housing advocacy: the role of red-tape warriors. Routledge Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003050872

Strang, L. J. (2019). Originalism's Promise: A Natural Law Account of the American Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

SURVEY FINDS LACK OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING THE LEADING CAUSE OF HOMELESSNESS IN THE UNITED STATES. (2005). Journal of Housing and Community Development, 62(2), 14. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/liberty.edu?url=https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/survey-finds-lack-affordable-housing-leading/docview/230129865/se-2

Whittington, K. E. (2017). THE PLACE OF CONGRESS IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 40(3), 573-601. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/liberty.edu?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/place-congress-constitutional-order/docview/1914089586/se-2

Whittington, K. (2021). The Role of Norms in Our Constitutional Order. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 44(1), 17+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A651178650/GBIB?u=vic_liberty&sid=summon&xid=fb0fb999

Williams, N. A. (2021). Contempt for Oversight and Investigation: Congressional Contemnors, the Grand Jury, and Constitutional Order. The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy., 19(2).

Yaroni, A. (2011). The Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program: Issues of allocations and locations (Order No. AAI3425223). Available from Social Science Premium Collection. (1018354473; 201223292). https://go.openathens.net/redirector/liberty.edu?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/low-income-housing-tax-credit-program-issues/docview/1018354473/se-2

Teasdale, S. (2012). Negotiating Tensions: How Do Social Enterprises in the Homelessness Field Balance Social and Commercial Considerations? Housing Studies, 27(4), 514–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.677015